On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:25 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > I totally missed the 1.3.99.6 release because the mail was a reply to > an old announcement and was sorted into an old mail thread.
I use Evolution's "edit as new message" to clone the previous announcement, which usually starts a new mail thread. However, the previous announcement also already had an "in-reply-to" header, so at some point in the past I must have made the mistake of using reply-to. The next announcement will be a truly virgin email where I just cut-and-paste text, I swear ;-/ > I also regulary checked https://syncevolution.org/blogs > where all the other 1.3.99.x versions were mentioned, but 1.3.99.6 is > missing there, too. Good point, I forgot to publish that. In my release checklist it's a separate point from writing the post, but this time I wasn't quite following that list (lot of last minute changes, etc.) and forgot about that point. > Regarding libsynthesis, the > libsynthesis_3.4.0.47+syncevolution-1-3-99-6 git tag is missing commit > 572bba1742c290607755e6ec2e95c5e0733466f4 which bumbs the libsynthesis > version to 3.4.0.47.1, but syncevolution 1.3.99.6 requires 3.4.0.47.1. The libsynthesis_3.4.0.47+syncevolution-1-3-99-6 git tag has the commit (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/SyncEvolution/libsynthesis/commit/?id=572bba1742c290607755e6ec2e95c5e0733466f4), the release wouldn't have compiled otherwise. It's just master that hadn't been updated to that tag yet. Fixed. > Sorry for complaining so much. :-) Not at all, thanks for pointing this out. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
