On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 22:30:13 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: [...]
> Correct. I am occasionally setting tags anew when a release candidate > turns out to require further changes. The alternative would be to assign > new versions to each release candidate, but that could lead to an > inflation of version numbers. I'd prefer to stick with the current > approach, even though it can be confusing occasionally. > > Perhaps annotated tags avoid this problem - I need to check that. Hi, as often, it's just a matter of proper adjustment of the git configuration. In this case, "git config --local --add remote.<remote name>.fetch +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*" did the trick. Regards, Tino _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
