On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 07:03 +0000, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > On 09/04/2014 22:39:06, "Patrick Ohly" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >This is a two-edged sword. Users who only have one sync config can > >configure it as easily as before, without having to deal with multiple > >different invocations for the different entities involved. But anyone > >trying to do advanced things (and local sync with multiple different > >databases is advanced) needs to understand the underlying logic, or > >follow recipes. > > > I'm trying to follow the logic. > > What is considered the non-advanced scenario then?
The original SyncML based syncing with EDS as local storage is the easy case. Only the four standard databases (one of each kind), no need to choose anything other than a template (or syncURL/uris if no template exists) and credentials. The world has moved on since then, so it would be a good time to revisit concepts and adapt them where needed. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
