On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 01:57 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> > wrote: [UOA support] > > Is this support likely to be compiled in in the foreseeable > future? > > I'd prefer to keep with the test program for SyncEvolution. > > > I think I can add it next week.
Sorry, the Google CardDAV interoperability kept me and the nightly build machine busy. I enabled provideruoa.so compilation on Ubuntu Saucy and will include it in the next SyncEvolution 1.4.99.2. I hesitate to say next week again, but that actually is the goal. > Would it be problematic to enable the xmlrpc backend also? I checked, enabling that would indeed be problematic. The backend depends on the C++ version of xmlrpc, which changed the ABI between Ubuntu Saucy and Trusty. If I compiled on Saucy (which is fairly easy to do because I have the distro already set up for compiling some part of the binary release), then the backend won't work on Trusty. I'd prefer to not spend more effort on offering a binary which only one user asked for at the moment. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
