On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 01:57 +0200, Emiliano Heyns wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> > > wrote: > [UOA support] > > > Is this support likely to be compiled in in the foreseeable > > future? > > > I'd prefer to keep with the test program for SyncEvolution. > > > > > > I think I can add it next week. > > Sorry, the Google CardDAV interoperability kept me and the nightly build > machine busy. > > No problem. > I enabled provideruoa.so compilation on Ubuntu Saucy and will include it > in the next SyncEvolution 1.4.99.2. I hesitate to say next week again, > but that actually is the goal. > > Also not a problem. > > Would it be problematic to enable the xmlrpc backend also? > > I checked, enabling that would indeed be problematic. The backend > depends on the C++ version of xmlrpc, which changed the ABI between > Ubuntu Saucy and Trusty. If I compiled on Saucy (which is fairly easy to > do because I have the distro already set up for compiling some part of > the binary release), then the backend won't work on Trusty. > > I'd prefer to not spend more effort on offering a binary which only one > user asked for at the moment. > > And no objections to that at all. I'll see what I can put together, knowing that these can be compiled and loaded separately. In the end, I want a scriptable backend, I just figured that if xmlrpc was already there, an xmlrpc proxy would be easier to create than a new SyncEvolution backend. Thanks, Emile
_______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
