On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 18:00 +0100, Graham Cobb wrote: > On 29/09/16 13:45, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Before I tag and release this as 1.5.2, it would be great to get some > > feedback that this release doesn't cause regressions. In particular, > > syncing with phones over Bluetooth needs some testing because there has > > been one change that I couldn't fully test myself (only seems to make a > > difference with some phones). > > I have just tried to run a quick check that sync with Exchange > Activesync is working. It isn't (activesyncd is exiting due to a > "Trace/breakpoint trap").
Indeed, I should have mentioned activesync as something which needs manual testing :-/ I no longer have an Exchange server to test against, so all I do at the moment is to build activesyncd and the backend. I probably should bite the bullet and pay for one of the hosted Exchange services. > Meanwhile I would like to know what the dbus-launch changes mean for > running on headless systems (no X11). I previously used a version of > dbus-session.sh from you. I still seem to need it. Is that the > expected behaviour? The script is still around, and you will still need it on old systems. Some more modern distros may set up a user session bus even for headless logins. On those you won't need the script, or D-Bus may be recent enough to have dbus-run-session, which is a better alternative to dbus-session.sh. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
