deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> writes: > Another option would be to use this synchronization interface in obexd, I > posted before - but I guess it would need much more work - time that we do > not have, I guess.
The OBEX synchronization support is an incomplete replacement for SyncML. I looked at it when I was doing PBAB support and my conclusion at the time was that it is not suitable for incremental sync, so I never bothered with trying to use it. But I don't remember what the exact issues were - something about long-lived identifiers for items, I believe. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org https://lists.syncevolution.org/mailman/listinfo/syncevolution
