On 13/11/2012 17:27, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 11/13/12 4:11 PM, Jan Bernhardt a écrit : >> Sounds fair. > IMHO, and IANAL being added, adding a reference somwhere in a Notice is > just a no brainer. *But*, and this has to be checked with [email protected], > remains the problem of copyright. Just signaling that a part of code was > developped with some external entity fonds does not necessarily imply > that the code is now copyrighted under The AL 2.0. I think you should > ask for more : that the entity which paid for the developpement - so to > speak, which then owns the code - formally grant The ASF the right to > use the code under an AL 2.0. > > Again, IANAL...
Sorry, I should have tell this before: they have already signed and sent the software grant [1] and the corporate CLA [2] for Rave. I guess then that they only have to submit a new software grant [1] for "Role provisioning features for Apache Syncope", right? Regards. [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
