Le 11/13/12 5:56 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò a écrit : > On 13/11/2012 17:27, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> Le 11/13/12 4:11 PM, Jan Bernhardt a écrit : >>> Sounds fair. >> IMHO, and IANAL being added, adding a reference somwhere in a Notice is >> just a no brainer. *But*, and this has to be checked with [email protected], >> remains the problem of copyright. Just signaling that a part of code was >> developped with some external entity fonds does not necessarily imply >> that the code is now copyrighted under The AL 2.0. I think you should >> ask for more : that the entity which paid for the developpement - so to >> speak, which then owns the code - formally grant The ASF the right to >> use the code under an AL 2.0. >> >> Again, IANAL... > Sorry, I should have tell this before: they have already signed and sent > the software grant [1] and the corporate CLA [2] for Rave. > > I guess then that they only have to submit a new software grant [1] for > "Role provisioning features for Apache Syncope", right?
The fact that they have signed a sofware grant for a project does not implicitely implies they want that all what they paid for should be granted to The ASF. I know, I know, this is probably exactly what they have in mind, and I'm splitting hairs in 4 here, but still, check with Legal if there is not something they should wrt the software grant for Syncope... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
