typo:
>>>renaming inline canvas/encapsulate to Group can help but impede a user
to catch synfig concept quickly.
renaming inline canvas/encapsulate to Group can not help but impede a user
to catch synfig concept quickly.
~ yu
2012/5/13 Yu Chen <[email protected]>
> Hi
>
> 1)
> Regarding encapsulate and group, I have to point out that synfig layer
> is primitive layer, in other graphics softwares in the world,
> they are normally defined as objects, take a look at Adobe Illustrator or
> Inkscape. There is another key point I have to mention capsulated
> layers are not 100% the same as group layers in other software, a
> capsulated layer is a canvas (exported or inline) in fact in synfig world.
> If
> we rename it to group, a user (newbie) will still expect it behaves as in
> other graphic softwares. so from my point of view this renaming can
> not solve the problem we are trying to solve.
>
> Yes, I redesigned group and inline canvas icons[1], there was some facts
> when I did them: I didn't know what exactly the inline canvas and
> group meaning in synfig, as most of newbies come from other graphics
> world, you can see at the forum discussions, I made a proposal
> using a "Folder" metaphor for inline canvas and for group too. From this
> mistake I made, we can have some valuable things: renaming
> inline canvas/encapsulate to Group can help but impede a user to catch
> synfig concept quickly. We all have to agree that "ease to learn" is
> not our main target since doing full feature animation movie with computer
> is not a ease job.
>
>
> If we finally make the decision that we have to rename encapsulate to
> group, group to sets, it will fine to me. but I can't agree with
> "keeping the current group icon as sets icon". Imaging a newbie come from
> other graphics software which has group layer concept as
> in the most graphics software, s/he except the "sets" behaves as group
> layer since most softwares use "Folder" icon as group layer.
>
> From UX point of view (I am doing researching job for UI Redesign), Group
> concept in current synfig will be replace be a filter system of
> layers, I have some initial ideas in my mind: each layer can be tagged by
> user, and can be filtered. I will find time to draw some mockups
> and post in here or forums to brainstorm.
>
> 2)
> For BLine, I have one proposal : just use "Line". Curve is fine to me too,
> be based on my experience, if I saw a word curve, I will always
> expect the line is a non-straight line :) BLine can be a straight line,
> isn't it?
>
>
> Just my two cents.
>
>
> [1] http://www.synfig.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=1362&start=30
>
>
> ~ yu
>
>
>
> 2012/5/13 Timothée Giet <[email protected]>
>
>> So for now we agree on:
>>
>> -Control points : OK (genete: I like the "handle" idea too, but let's
>> shoose "control point" if everyone agree… is still more precise, and I
>> think it works well also for all kind of points, as they are still here to
>> control something. And it fits Inkscape terminology. On this point I think
>> now it's even more important to get terminology compatible with Inkscape as
>> much as possible, if we want to support the "Inkscape to synfig" export
>> workflow…)
>>
>> -Graph panel : OK (I agree it's the best suggestion here)
>>
>> -Cpoint → Color Stop : Ok sure :)
>>
>> -Encapsulate and Paste canvas layer→ Group and Group Layer : OK (indeed
>> even for me it's the most intuitive term to use here)
>> -Groups → Sets : so OK (about the icons, I agree to get back the brown
>> icon for the layer groups, and for the sets as Zelgadis I think current
>> icons could stay, not really a problem… but if you really want some new
>> ones Genete, I can make some ;) )
>>
>> Now about Bline→ Curve or Path , Path still looks the best choice to me…
>> As genete said, "Path tool" sounds better; about confusion with animation
>> path Zelgadis said, it makes me even more think that path is the right word
>> as you can animate following a path… it makes sense. Also again it fits
>> Inkscape /general vector tools terminology, so it would be good to use this
>> word. But if you two prefer Curve, let's use it, I agree it's a hard
>> choice… Checking the "Bezier curve" wikipedia page carefully, both terms
>> could fit.
>>
>> Waiting for you two (and if any other have something to say about this…)
>> to confirm (or not) the list, and give your final choices.
>>
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Live Security Virtual Conference
>> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synfig-devl mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Synfig-devl mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
