2012/12/4 Konstantin Dmitriev <ksee.zelga...@gmail.com>: > 2012/12/4 Carlos López González <genet...@gmail.com>: >> Hi folks! >> >> Lately the number of illegal posts on the SF trackers are increasing. I >> don't know if it is possible to restrict the comments to registered users >> only but for the moment I haven't found a way to set up like that. >> In Github code comment and issues additions is restricted to registered >> users. >> >> It seems that there isn't a clear way to transfer the trackers from SF to >> github [1]. >> >> The tracker is receiving many spam comments and they can only can be hidden, >> not deleted, so at the end the spammers have its spam post alive. >> >> Looks like the new project features from SF, Allura [2] still allowing >> anonymous comments on the trackers but it won't allow create new tickets to >> non registered users. >> >> So the thing is: Why don't we migrate to Allura format (Looks like it is >> still delayed but the plan is that every project should use it [3]) and see >> how the new tracker works?. If it receives less spam we can continue using >> it until we decide finally the code migration. If the situation is the same, >> then we can think rush on migrate to github or to any other place. >> >> In my opinion, tie trackers to code is the best idea and if we finally would >> go to github, I think that the sooner we adopt the new tracker , the better. >> >> Cheers! >> >> [1] https://github.com/ttencate/sf2github >> [2] https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/wiki/Allura%20Wiki/ >> [3] >> https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/community-docs/Hosted%20Apps%20Retirement/ > > Carlos, thank you for bringing this up! > I agree that we have to migrate our bugtracking system. > In my opinion we should stay away from sf.net solutions (that's > personal - I just don't like it). > From my point of view TheBugGenuie looks as very attractive - > http://www.thebuggenie.com/ > - it have github integration, agile management, it's opensource (we > can run a copy at our servers)> And yes, it's interface looks lovely > (that's important for me). > We have not that much (open) bugs in the tracker now, so even manual > migration would take 3-4 days. > K.
Dear developers! I am pleased to introduce the new bugtracker for Synfig: http://synfig.org/issues/thebuggenie/synfig/issues/open It is based on TheBugGenie system. Please feel free to test and give your feedback. Here's a sample of issue in SF.net bugtracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1569617&group_id=144022&atid=757416 ,,,and this how it looks when imported into the new bugtracker: http://synfig.org/issues/thebuggenie/synfig/issues/3 The system is integrated with github - see here: http://issues.thebuggenie.com/wiki/VCSIntegration#article_131_toc_8 ("Using the module" section). Cheers! K -- http://morevnaproject.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Synfig-devl mailing list Synfig-devl@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
