Hi!
El jueves, 20 de febrero de 2014, Yu Chen <jco...@gmail.com> escribió:
> Hi,
>
> We have "Default Opacity" dropdown in Toolbox, which affects new layer's
> Amount. Do you think it would be better to unify this term? Just using
> Amount, since we have some layers which relevant parameter can not be
> called "Opacity".
>
Correct me if I'm wrong, but layers that it's amount doesn't mean opacity
aren't affected by this default widget. So if the thing is a question of
nomenclature, why don't we change the parameter name from amount to opacity
at the layers where it means that?
> And even further, do we really need this "Opacity" preference exposed on
> UI? Does it really help for users? I remember that in the forums, there
> were posts by some users( newbies and advanced users), complaining they had
> no idea why their new layers became transparent, just because they didn't
> noticed the "Default Opacity" had been set to a value less than 1.
>
I'm not in favour of just remove the widget but better allow expose it or
not to save space. This way everyone is happy ^__^ Pulling this to the
absurd, why do we need the default brush or the default color widgets? I
think that it is very helpful to allow to change the default construction
parameters that in my opinion, the opacity is one of the basics.
> What's your opinion?
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> ~ yu
>
--
Carlos
http://synfig.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Synfig-devl mailing list
Synfig-devl@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
