Ok. That's fine.
On 05/30/2017 08:23 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Hi Dave,
Those files are official project release artifacts so yes, we need to
keep them. And the update mirrors have served as our backups of those
files.
I'd prefer it stay as is.
Regards,
KAM
On 5/28/2017 10:59 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Kevin,
Do we need to keep rule update files back to 2007? It seems like
having only the past year or even few months is all that we need.
Technically, the only ones that need to be in the updates directory
are ones that are pointed to by the [reverse
version].updates.spamassassin.org TXT DNS records.
root@sa-vm1:/var/www/bbmass.spamassassin.org/updates# ll *.tar* | wc -l
4347
It's not a bid deal to leave things as they are but it doesn't make
sense to keep them around in the SA mirrors if they are never going to
be used by sa-update.
We would need to keep:
752902.tar.gz* for 3.1.*
895075.tar.gz* for 3.2.*
1786853.tar.gz* for 3.3.3 and greater
I would like to move all other versions of files to an archive
subdirectory that is excluded in the rsyncd.conf that are older than 1
month if that is OK with everyone else. This could become important
if we start building new rules more than once a day.