On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Balazs Scheidler wrote:
> Would it be possible to add a Reply-To header containing the list address?
> I've accidentally sent a message private, though I meant to send it to the
> list.
I'm against that. Correcting that mistake is far easier than the other way
'round. Besides, mutt should offer a "reply-to-all" function.
Simon
ObOnTopic: Wishlist (derived from actual need):
- Possibility to use this protocol on a serial cable: We have a machine
with eight serial ports and no network connection as the log server
here. I don't want to open the log server to the net or even expose its
presence to the casual hacker using nmap.
- Compression of equal/similar(?) lines at the originating host.
- Clear authentication, but no trust even to authenticated machines
(we're talking of open internet systems here).
Simon
PGP public key available from ftp://phobos.fs.tum.de/pub/pgp/geier.asc
Fingerprint: 10 62 F6 F5 C0 5D 9E D8 47 05 1B 8A 22 E5 4E C1
