>>>>> "Roger" == Roger Marquis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Roger> Why would you need 256 priorities when almost no applications use more Roger> than 2 or 3 of the existing 8? Why not? I can _easily_ imagine needing more than 8. Imagining more than 256 is possible but requires significantly more effort. It's conveniently one byte, and avoids bit-fields. -- Carson Gaspar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~carson/home.html Queen Trapped in a Butch Body
Re: facilities & priorities
by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 10 Apr 2000 10:30:00 -0700
