FYI -
All drafts from the BOF and this discussion list should be submitted as
Internet Drafts (ID) in the "independent submissions" category - not
associated with a WG. The title is usually in the form
draft-<author>-<subject acronym>-<ver>.txt
but the author can suggest a title in a different form, although the
editor may rename it, in which case it must be corrected in the ID text
in an update. The ID must be provided in ASCII text in a form fairly
close to the RFC2223 standard format; Postscript can also be provided.
For more information see
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt,
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2223.txt, and
http://www.rfc-editor.org/howtopub.html.
--
Alex Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1 617 504 8761Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ruebert.ieee.org (ruebert.ieee.org [199.172.136.3])
by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA29118
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:02:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gemini.ieee.org by ruebert.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
NAA27964; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:02:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ROAD-WARRIOR-177.MIT.EDU (ROAD-WARRIOR-177.MIT.EDU [18.177.3.178])
by gemini.ieee.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20207
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 13:02:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rw-177.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ROAD-WARRIOR-177.MIT.EDU (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA00607;
Tue, 23 Nov 1999 12:58:36 -0500
From: Jeffrey Schiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 17:58:36 GMT
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Syslog BOF: should I continue with draft IDs?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Jeffrey Schiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (compatible; StarOffice/5.1; Linux)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by world.std.com id NAA29118
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Yes, they should be submitted under the individual's names. Once the
working group is formed they can be grouped with it.
-Jeff
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 11/22/99, 3:50:37 PM, Alex Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding
Re: Syslog BOF: should I continue with draft IDs?:
> > You should take the documents you have and submit them to the Internet
> > Drafts directory. I would also encourage the folks pushing for the XML
> > approach to post their documents as well.
> Thanks - I assume you mean they should be submitted under the
individual
> authors' names, to be located in the "individual submissions"
> (http://www.ietf.org/ids.by.wg/none.html) subtree. If a WG is formed,
> can an "individual submissions" draft take on a "draft-ietf-xxx.txt"
> title and move into the WG subtree, or does it have to be rewritten
and
> resubmitted?
> > The IETF is strongly biased toward "running code." I would encourage
> > all to actually put together implementations. Given the subject matter
> > a "drop in" replacement for syslog would be the form of "running code"
> > for this group.
> I'll pass this on to the email list and encourage authors of
replacement
> candidates to write up drafts.
> --
> Alex Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +1 617 504 8761
