In some email I received from Calabrese, Christopher, sie wrote: [...] > Yeah, I'm willing to concede the point. I'm beginning to think > YYMMDDmmhhss.fraction really is better since it's easier to deal with in a > tcpdump, etc. Y2K bug alert! How about Year-month-monthday-hour(24)-minute-second.fraction ? I said it like that because I'm not sure this would be easily understood: YYYY[Y]*-MM-DD-HH-MM-SS.fraction Solves the Y10K problem :-) Darren
- Re: times... Darren Reed
- Re: times... Kriss Andsten
- Re: times... Klaus Moeller
- Re: times... by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: times... Russ Allbery
- Re: times... by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: times... Kriss Andsten
- Re: times... Chris Calabrese
- Re: times... Klaus Moeller
- RE: times... Calabrese, Christopher
- Darren Reed
