[Chris Lonvick]
> 4.2 Domain Name and Address
[...]
> This may be shown in this specific example again using ISO 8601
> nomenclature.
> <52> Jan 01 12:00:01 myhost.example.org ..remainder of message..
That date is definitely not an ISO 8601. I guess you forgot to edit
it. :-)
I liked the new new draft, and it fixed all the sections I had
problems with.
My only concern are the message example in section 3. I believe one
of them should be of the form proposed in section 4. If not, I fear
readers might get the impression that the example messages are good
syslog messages, when in fact most of them are bad.
Why is the bibliography missing the old syslog draft proposing a
common format for the syslog messages themselves? I believe it should
be suggested reading for the implementors of syslog tools.
--
##> Petter Reinholdtsen <## | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
