This new proposal from John Kelsey seems an excellent one. Just the ticket. As for making the packets unreadable by sniffers, though.... Is that the whole point here? I mean, I know it's a good thing for debugging, but that's only when you're debugging. Under normal conditions, I won't want my logs to be sniffiable. Encryption should be in the protocol design, but when/whether to use it is an implementation/administration issue.
- what level for end-to-end signing? Chris Calabrese
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? Alex Brown
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? John Kelsey
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? Chris M. Lonvick
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? Darren New
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? John Kelsey
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? Chris M. Lonvick
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? Chris Calabrese
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? Darren New
- Re: what level for end-to-end signing? Chris Calabrese
