At 03:19 PM 9/26/2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> We need some solid reviews of the syslog-sign ID. We >> especially need to hear from people who plan to implement > >Hai > >I'm planning to review it, but time time time. > >I was already started in the -02, but will goto the -03 version. >Will try to mail my review notes next week, will that do? > >And yes, I'm (we are) planning to implement it (it will become opensource) > >--ALbert Hi Albert, We'll wait for your notes as well as notes from Balazs. Glad to hear about the opensource. :-) Many thanks, Chris
- Updated web page and draft-ietf-syslog-sign-03.txt Chris M. Lonvick
- Re: Updated web page and draft-ietf-syslog-sign-03.t... Balazs Scheidler
- RE: Updated web page and draft-ietf-syslog-sign-03.t... albert . mietus
- Re: Updated web page and draft-ietf-syslog-sign-03.t... Chris M. Lonvick
- Re: Updated web page and draft-ietf-syslog-sign-03.t... Balazs Scheidler
- Re: Updated web page and draft-ietf-syslog-sign-03.t... Jon Callas
- Re: Updated web page and draft-ietf-syslog-sign-... Balazs Scheidler
- Re: Updated web page and draft-ietf-syslog-sign-... Jon Callas
- IP Address Notation in syslog-sign Chris M. Lonvick
- Re: IP Address Notation in syslog-sign Balazs Scheidler
- Priority and Version Fields Chris M. Lonvick
- Re: Priority and Version Fields Balazs Scheidler
