Hi Chris, I'm a lurker, and I think I've been deleting, without reading, about 90% of the material on the syslog-sec list in the past 6 months. I'm 100% in favor of a completely moderated list, but the proposed solution will be better than the situation today. Besides, I imagine you have better things to do with your spare time :-)
Best wishes, Carl Friedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:14 PM To: syslog-sec Subject: Fwd: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mailing lists Hi Folks, Does anyone disagree with this policy for this mailing list? If I don't get any disagreement within the next week or so, I'll dig into the configuration and make the appropriate changes. ...and I'll pay close attention to received messages. Thanks, Chris >From: The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: IETF-Announce:; >Subject: Guidance for spam-control on IETF mailing lists >Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 10:03:56 -0500 >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >The level of spam on IETF mailing lists has now reached the level that >we encourage the use of operational controls as described in: > > http://www.ietf.org/IESG/STATEMENTS/mail-submit-policy.txt > >In particular, list managers are encouraged to employ the use of >automatic mechanisms that immediately distribute messages submitted by >subscribers and other known email addresses while directing all other >messages to a human reviewer for rejection or approval.
