Hi Tom, I disagree in the regard that internationalization is not related to transport. In my point of view, the internationalization goes into the payload (read MSG part) and is *not* depending on any specific transport. Maybe I really need to draft some spec to clarify this, but so far I have only limited information. I'll probably post some text once I have enough together to do so relatively intelligently...
Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Perrine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 8:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Rainer Gerhards; > Subject: Re: Syslog Internationalization - Message size > > > I think that the internationlization is yet another last nail in the > coffin of UDP syslog. > > Its just Really Time To Move On. > > SDSC Syslog, syslog-ng and so many others have proven that TCP syslog > is workable, practical and effective. There is just no more room on > the tired old cardboard box of UDP syslog for any more duct tape. > > That's about $0.04 worth. > > --tep > > -- > Tom E. Perrine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > http://www.sdsc.edu/~tep/ | > >
