Hi, Below is what I'm planning on sending to the WG to let them know that we're done.
=== Hi Folks, I'm satisfied that we've had adequate review and discussion on the issues around draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls. Many thanks to those who reviewed and submitted their suggestions for making the text clearer and more accurate. We've addressed the IESG issues of: - changes requested for Section 5.2 for IDNs and matching http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg02113.html - Tim Polk's comment about a reference pointer http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg02082.html (I never did get a "me too".) - system v. registered port http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg02070.html (Follow the thread.) - the use of an IANA registry http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg02082.html and the GEN-ART review issues here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg02063.html === I think that if you deal with these, we can wrap it up. :-) Thanks, Chris _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
