David
I looked at boilerplates and this I-D does not conform to
Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts
dated 9 February 2010.
The copyright,
" Copyright (c) YYYY IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with
respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this
document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in
Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without
warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License."
must precede the 'Internet-Draft Boilerplate' and note that there is an extra
'Simplified' in it compared with the I-D.
And there is an additional /ietf/ in the very first URL in the I-D as it stands
which is also now an .html and no longer a .txt.
I am not sure what you are looking for with References; my experience is that
xml2rfc does a better job than I ever do:-(
But, as I have said before, 2914 and 5405 are no longer referenced in the body
of
the I-D. The references all exist and are not obsoleted and I agree with the
division of Normative and Informative.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Harrington" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:28 PM
Subject: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-syslog-dtls
> Hi,
>
> This message officially starts the Syslog Working Group Last Call for
> the following document:
>
> Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Transport Mapping for Syslog
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-dtls-01.txt
>
> The Working Group Last Call for this document will end February 19.
>
> To help get this document reviewed throughly, we are seeking
> volunteers to review the documents for the following special reviews:
> 1) Spelling and grammar,
> 2) boilerplates and reference review,
> 3) security review
>
> The chairs want to see a minimum number of content reviews before we
> submit the documents to the IESG. If you review the document and it
> looks fine, please post a statement that you have reviewed and found
> the document acceptable. Obviously, it if does not look acceptable
> please identify your objections, preferably with suggested text that
> would make it acceptable.
>
> Thanks,
> David Harrington
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
> co-chair, Syslog WG
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
