> Hi WG, > > I have not heared back on this topic. So I conclude that it is consensus > that the message size specification be left as it currently is in > syslog-protocol-15. We might put further limits in the transport > mappings.
> If someone objects to this view, please do it now as I plan to update > the I-D in the not so distant future. The only place a message size limit should be specified is in a transport mapping. If it's in -15 then it should be removed. Limits of all sizes and types do nothing but contribute to aging of a protocol. Darren _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
