On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 09:25 -0700, Chris Lonvick wrote: > Hi Darren, > > There is no need for Bazsi to write a different i-d. > draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls is a Working Group document and the > final revision must reflect WG consensus. > > If Bazsi (or anybody else) can propose changes to > draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls and the WG reaches consensus on the > proposed changes, then the document will be revised to reflect that. > > Please check me if I'm wrong on this, but I think that the only changes > between syslog-ng and what's in syslog-transport-tls are > - framing, > - changes to address the threat model (listed in our Charter). >
Yes, the changes are about as simple as that. syslog-ng currently uses EOL characters for record termination, and we agreed to using byte-counted records instead to permit any kind of character within the message. -- Bazsi _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
