<inline> Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Darren Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 6:25 PM Subject: Re: [Syslog] Decisions to make about the Huawei IPR claim
> Hi Darren, > > There is no need for Bazsi to write a different i-d. > draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls is a Working Group document and the > final revision must reflect WG consensus. > I think that draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls is seriously flawed and I have already made some comments on this, have others pending. But I am now reluctant to make any constructive suggestions lest my text be slightly modified, incorporated into this I-D and then made subject to an IPR claim. I believe we need a new document, or at least a new editor who is prepared to rewrite everything. I am not saying it should be that of Bazsi, just anyone who does not have H*** in their e-mail address. Tom Petch > If Bazsi (or anybody else) can propose changes to > draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls and the WG reaches consensus on the > proposed changes, then the document will be revised to reflect that. > > Please check me if I'm wrong on this, but I think that the only changes > between syslog-ng and what's in syslog-transport-tls are > - framing, > - changes to address the threat model (listed in our Charter). > > Thanks, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
