B) As the document is technically inadequate as a standard for syslog over TLS, we would also benefit from a fresh start with an editor without H*** in their e-mail address.
Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 12:23 AM Subject: [Syslog] Need your input on the Hauwei IPR claim > Hi Folks, > > Everyone has now had a week to think about the IETF process on IPR claims. > The first decision that we need to make is about the terms of the claim. > I'd like to hear what people think about the terms that Huawei has > presented. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?&ipr_id=724 > > Please keep in mind that we can (and should) proceed with > syslog-transport-tls if the terms appear reasonable and you (as > implementors) are willing to accept them. Let's keep this discussion > focused. > - We do not need a discussion of the terms. > - We do not need any legal opinions. > - We do not need a discussion of technical alternatives on this thread. > > >From that, I'd like to hear either: > > A) The WG SHOULD proceed with draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls as a Working > Group document. > > or > > B) The WG SHOULD NOT proceed with draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls as a > Working Group document. > > I'll leave this open until the 19th (so people going to the IETF can catch > their collective breaths and give a good opinion. > > If the consensus appears to be "A" then we can get straight back to work. > > If the consensus appears to be "B" then I will very briefly ask if there > are changes to the terms that would make them acceptable. I'll only ask > that if the consensus appears to be "B" so don't insert your opinions on > that at this time. I'm (just barely) willing to ask that (once) of the > Huawei lawyers but I feel that negotiating terms is not going to move us > forward; it's likely to be a rat-hole discussion and I won't let us go > down there. > > If the consensus remains "B" then we will likely move away from > syslog-transport-tls. Where we move to will be a different discussion so > please don't insert your opinion about that on this discussion thread. > David has opened that discussion on a separate thread so you may discuss > it on the list, but I'm not focused on that at this time. > > Thanks, > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
