Sorry, the comments are for syslog-protocol. Thanks!
> -----Original Message----- > From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 5:10 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [Syslog] Working Group Last Calls > > Hi, > > Some my review finding: > > 1, "originator" is used twice in the document without > terminology definition, "original sender" is used in other > paragraphs for the same entity, replace "originator" with > "original sender"? > > 2, Section 8.4, "Cryptographically signing messages could > prevent the alteration of TIMESTAMPs and thus the replay > attack.', Signature is only one option for message integrity. > My suggestion is to change it to "Message or transport > integrity mechansim could be used to prevent the alteration > TIMESTAMP of the message or message delivery sequence." > > 3, TimeStamp: when timestamp is set, by whom? An originator > or relay? I can not find in the doc. BTW, TIMESTAMP can be > utilized to avoid a forward loop descripted in section 8.9, > if it is set by originator. > > Thanks! > Miao > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:35 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Syslog] Working Group Last Calls > > > > Hi, > > > > The WGLC for -protocol-17 and -udp-07 documents will end > later today. > > Please review and comment on these documents today. > > > > David Harrington > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Syslog mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > > > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
