I strongly applaude the version number. Let's keep it in. More reviews if I manage to do so.
Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Lonvick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 6:49 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: version field in syslog-tls - was: RE: [Syslog] > Working Group LastCall: syslog-tls document > > Hi All, > > Please do consider the version field. If we don't have one, > we would have > to live forever with the decisions we are making now. Having > a version > number in there would allow a future group to re-decide things (like > byte-count v. special character) and to just change the > version number > rather than go asking for a new port number - or have a flag day. > > Please review the document and send in your thoughts on this. > > Thanks, > Chris > > On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Miao Fuyou wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > One "major" change to the document is a "version" field for > Syslog TLS > > transport is added to the frame header. The field is to > make port reusing > > possible if the transport mapping document is updated in > the future. An IANA > > paragraph is added accordingly. > > > > Another change is about frame length bounding, Min-max > values(MUST, SHOULD) > > are added to the document. > > > > The two changed was made after discussion between editors > and chairs. > > Discussion and feedback is welcome! > > > > Thanks! > > Miao > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: David Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 5:48 AM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: [Syslog] Working Group Last Call: syslog-tls document > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> This message officially starts the Syslog Working Group Last > >> Call for the following document: > >> > >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-syslog-transport-tls-03 > >> .txt > >> > >> The Working Group Last Call for this document will end > September 12. > >> > >> To help get these document reviewed throughly, we are seeking > >> volunteers to review the documents for the following > special reviews: > >> 1) Spelling and grammar, > >> 2) boilerplates and reference review, > >> 3) security review > >> > >> The chairs want to see a minimum number of content reviews > >> before we submit the documents to the IESG. If you review the > >> document and it looks fine, please post a statement that you > >> have reviewed and found the document acceptable. Obviously, > >> if it does not look acceptable please identify your > >> objections, preferably with suggested text that would make it > >> acceptable. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> David Harrington > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> co-chair, Syslog WG > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Syslog mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Syslog mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Syslog mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > > > > _______________________________________________ > Syslog mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
