Hi all, now that we obsolete RFC 3164 by -syslog-protocol, the only remaining RFC that is not compatible to the "new syslog series" is RFC 3195. The questions is now how to proceed here? I am raising this issue because it has some effect on syslog-sign. I would love to see 2k as limit for sign-generated messages, but that means we need to talk about 3195 (which not explicitely supports messages over 1k).
IMHO, we should do a 3195bis that updates 3195 to work as a transport mapping with syslog-protocol. After we've done that, we have finally unified all syslog RFCs and do not have any more issues with incompatibilities between them. I think this is something we should do soon. Comments? Rainer PS: I, too, would like to express my seasons greetings to all folks on the list! May you have a great and peaceful xmas time and a good start into the new year. _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
