If so, then I would propose to move the text into DESCRIPTION caluses, and not have them as comment lines.
Bert Wijnen > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: David B Harrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 10 januari 2008 8:47 > Aan: 'Glenn M. Keeni'; 'Romascanu, Dan (Dan)' > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Sam Hartman' > Onderwerp: [MIB-DOCTORS] RE: MIB Doctor review > ofdraft-ietf-syslog-tc-mib-04.txt > > > Hi, > > > Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > > > > > > 1. I do not believe that it is necessary to carry all the > duplicated > > > text in the MIB module as commented text, as it does not provide > any > > > significant implementation information. > > I will agree with this. > > Are there any other opinions / suggestions on this issue ? > > Syslog-WG > > I believe the normative nature of the labels and values, and the > non-normative nature of the mappings to applications, is important > information for implementation and interpretation. If the MIB module > is separated from the document, we want to make sure this information > stays with the MIB module. > > Therefeore, I would keep the text about the normative nature of the > labels and values in the MIB module and remove the duplicate text from > the surrounding document, if you are going to remove one of the > duplicates. > > David Harrington > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > MIB-DOCTORS mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
