I would guess that it is economics. As the price of space and speed go
down, and the price of efficiency (coding time) remains constant or
goes up, it's cheaper to put bloatware on bigger faster machines.
On Oct 6, 2004, at 5:33 PM, Byron Q. Desnoyers Winmill wrote:
I really don't get it. Can anyone offer suggestions as to why
System 6 era was so much more efficient?
--
System6 is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...
123Inkjets.com <http://lowendmac.com/ad/123inkjets.html>
Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>
System 6 Heaven <http://www.euronet.nl/users/mvdk/system_6_heaven.html>
System6 info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/system6.html>
--> AOL users, remove "mailto:"
Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/system6%40mail.maclaunch.com/>
Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com