On Friday 13 Aug 2010 15:54:28 Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 13.08.10 00:18, Adam Spragg (a...@spra.gg) wrote: > > > > So [auditctl] would be something to set to "Type=finish" and > > > > "ValidNoProcess=no". > > > > > > > > (Oh, and if you have a better suggestion for a name of > > > > ValidNoProcess= I am all ears too!) > > > > 'RequiresProcess='? > > Hmm, that would turn around the logic. I'd rathe have an option that > defaults to "off", and when specified may be set on "on".
Maybe. I have a long-ingrained dislike of boolean flags/variables/settings that include a "no" or "not" in them. "notfound" is a particular peeve of mine in a codebase I'm currently working on. Deciphering "!notfound" and "notfound" unnecessarily requires more brain cycles than "found" and "!found" would have. I have to stop and check I'm doing what I think I'm doing every time I come across it. I also have the same problem with UIs that have checkboxes marked "disable feature X". It's just *awkward* - more so than it needs to be. I'd rather have a flag that is easy to read and make sense of, even if it does default to "on" instead of "off". Of course, that is only a personal preference of mine. Adam _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
