On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) said: > > Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy > > to rename this. > > > > So, Kay and I came up with these two ideas: > > > > KeepAfterExit= > > ActiveAfterExit= > > It brings back the word you just dropped elsewhere, but maybe > 'FinishedOnExit' or similar?
But that again trusn the lgoic around. Maybe "ContinueAfterExit="? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
