On Mon, 02.05.11 18:33, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:13:08 +0200 > > Otherwise using uClibc compilation (OpenEmbedded [1] with > `minimal-uclibc` for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`) fails with the > following error message. > --- a/src/util.h > +++ b/src/util.h > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > #include <inttypes.h> > #include <time.h> > #include <sys/time.h> > +#include <stdarg.h> > #include <stdbool.h> > #include <stdlib.h> > #include <stdio.h> Hmm, this should be enough to include in util.c, not util.h, right? Normally I'd say that it is uclibc's job to ensure compat with glibc. But in this case I think it actually makes sense to include this, because we do use va_xxx and friends in util.c. Can you rework and test the patch if you include this in util.c rather then util.h? I'd be willing to merge such a patch then. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel