Am Montag, den 02.05.2011, 19:26 +0200 schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Mon, 02.05.11 18:33, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:13:08 +0200 > > > > Otherwise using uClibc compilation (OpenEmbedded [1] with > > `minimal-uclibc` for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`) fails with the > > following error message. > > > --- a/src/util.h > > +++ b/src/util.h > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ > > #include <inttypes.h> > > #include <time.h> > > #include <sys/time.h> > > +#include <stdarg.h> > > #include <stdbool.h> > > #include <stdlib.h> > > #include <stdio.h> > > Hmm, this should be enough to include in util.c, not util.h, right? > > Normally I'd say that it is uclibc's job to ensure compat with > glibc. But in this case I think it actually makes sense to include this, > because we do use va_xxx and friends in util.c. > > Can you rework and test the patch if you include this in util.c rather > then util.h? I'd be willing to merge such a patch then.
I tried adding it just to `util.c` and it did not fix the problem. Unfortunately I do not know what uClibc expects. I only know using EGLIBC and the same tool chain does not show this problem. Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
