On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:54:38AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 16:27 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > > Just to get an idea how all this fits together. How can TPM bios and > > IMA/AppArmor share this directory? They have their own subdirs in > > there, or both just use the securityfs infrastructure and not their > > own filesystem on top? > > They create their own subdirs under /sys/kernel/security. > tpm0, ima, apparmor, etc. > They create nodes in securityfs rather than implementing their own > pseudo filesystem type.
Then I have to ask, why is selinuxfs different here? Does securityfs not provide you the api you needed to implement selinuxfs on top of it without haveing to be a separate filesystem? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
