On Mon, 07.01.13 19:47, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > > 2013/1/7 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > > Well, for the NSS modules .la files make particularly little sense as > > nobody ever links against them except with dlopen() called from inside > > libc. And naked dlopen() doesn't know .la files, hence we can just > > unconditionally remove them. > > Well, there is libltdl which ttbomk requires the .la files for dlopen. > Not that this matters much for systemd, though.
libltdl doesn't need .la files really. And glibc's NSS interface doesn't use libltdl anyway, so if we'd ship .la files for our NSS plugin really nobody would ever use it because nobody but libc would try to dlopen() it... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
