On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > Why? Higher level, lower level, the term "level" is _very_ strongly tied > to (vertical) ordering. Also, height-related methaphors are one of the > most common in all languages, so using "level" makes the metaphor easy.
I guess you're right about it implying ordering, but it still doesn't clearly imply which ordering. Is a "higher level" message shown when the situation is more critical or when the program is running in a more verbose mode? > I prefer 'level' much more, mainly because, like you said, it's the program > that is verbose. And also because it's shorter. Agreed. -- David Strauss | da...@davidstrauss.net | +1 512 577 5827 [mobile] _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
