On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Mon, 11.02.13 16:34, Auke Kok (auke-jan.h....@intel.com) wrote: > >> Contrary to it's own packaging guidelines, these symlinks are created >> in /etc/. While technically not a problem, this makes it harder >> for folks installing from git that want to override these settings >> (either masking or otherwise). >> >> Moving the links to $(systemunitdir) resolves. > > I am not sure we really should do this. Both of these units should be > allowed to be disabled, and always telling people to mask them sounds a > bit too much... > > Dunno, I am a bit split about this. I see where you are coming from, but > just making them static sounds like too simple... > > (Also, if we make them static we'd drop the [Install] section, as that > would be pointless then...) > > So, I am really unsure... Dunno... Opinions?
then let's just remove them (the symlinks) altogether. Auke _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
