On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> >> On Monday 2013-01-07 23:29, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> > >> >For your example the new code would pick a name of "enp0s0d0", i.e. for >> >pci bus 0, slot 0, and dev_id 0. >> >> Is it Solaris time yet? enp0s0d0, that's just like c0t0d0s0. And > > Heh, just in time when Solaris 11 deprecated such names, choosing > to name interfaces as net0, net1, net2....
The Solaris disk names are based on meaningless unpredictable enumerations, they have never been topology based. They are just 3 levels deep, which made them only slightly better than a single number, it's still the same useless enumeration with "inventing" artificial numbers. I don't remember seeing topology based names for network interfaces on Solaris, they did that? Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
