On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:29:10PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >> > >> On Monday 2013-01-07 23:29, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> > > >> >For your example the new code would pick a name of "enp0s0d0", i.e. for > >> >pci bus 0, slot 0, and dev_id 0. > >> > >> Is it Solaris time yet? enp0s0d0, that's just like c0t0d0s0. And > > > > Heh, just in time when Solaris 11 deprecated such names, choosing > > to name interfaces as net0, net1, net2.... > > The Solaris disk names are based on meaningless unpredictable > enumerations, they have never been topology based. They are just 3 > levels deep, which made them only slightly better than a single > number, it's still the same useless enumeration with "inventing" > artificial numbers. > > I don't remember seeing topology based names for network interfaces on > Solaris, they did that?
Not really, just "driver name""detection order" - ixgb0, nge1 etc. -- Tomasz Torcz "Funeral in the morning, IDE hacking xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl in the afternoon and evening." - Alan Cox _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
