'Twas brillig, and Reindl Harald at 11/04/13 12:10 did gyre and gimble: > > > Am 11.04.2013 13:02, schrieb Tom Gundersen: >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> >> wrote: >>> there are THOUSANDS of virtual machines with only two NICs and no >>> race-problems >> >> In the case where no renaming is done at all, and it JustWorks, then >> you can still disable persistent interface naming and everything will >> be as before. >> >> In the case where you have rules to rename the interfaces within the >> kernel namespace, you need to update the configuration (at least in >> the long-term; the change has happened upstream, but don't know what >> Fedora intends to do downstream) > > and because HERE IS UPSTREAM i ask here to not remove the code > for 70-persistent-net.rules because it just works in many cases > even with rename
It was removed a long time ago aready... Back in 187 or 188 IIRC (certainly around that time). So the question is really whether it should be added back in to allow this kind of broken-by-design setup (albeit with a lot of "THIS IS A HORRIBLE HACK" error messages thrown in to annoy people in their log files as punishment!)? Personally, I'd be happy to be a little pragmatic here (the code is not *that* hard to maintain), but I do also prefer the "fix things with the right design" philosophy generally. Ultimately the decision lies with Kay, so he's the one you have to convince! Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
