On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Colin Guthrie <gm...@colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
> Should we then consider trying to push a new default name scheme into > the kernel side such that they come up as "eth-ng0" etc. by default > allowing any userspace stuff to rename them to "eth1" or whatever > without so much likelihood of such conflicts. That would be the only manageable option if such rules would be need to make working. The kernel could have a parameter to reserve eth0-99, or so and the first interface it creates would be eth100. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
