On Thu, 18.04.13 16:38, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote: > Am 18.04.2013 16:04, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > > That said, screen should probably set up a new PAM session of its own > > and detach from the original one. > > That sounds like a good idea - unfortunately, screen does not seem to > have PAM session support at all, and I couldn't find the obvious place > to add this inside screen (I didn't invest much time in it either). This > would allow screen sessions to be tracked by logind instead of having > many "State=closing" sessions floating around.
BTW, this probably needs sokme changes in systemd too. Since right now, if you open a PAM session from a process that is already part of a PAM session logind will just return the same data as the first time. So to make this work properly, we'd to define a way how certain PAM services can explicitly ask to get a new session assigned. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
