On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Kok, Auke-jan H <auke-jan.h....@intel.com> wrote: > actually, that's a good point, but if the "socket" unit is dead, I > assume that systemd no longer is bind()ed to the ports...
I'd have to look at source or run some experiments for details, but I know systemd's socket listeners can get into a funk when the corresponding service is marked as failed. -- David Strauss | da...@davidstrauss.net | +1 512 577 5827 [mobile] _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
