On Wed, 24.04.13 10:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> [ 0.019862] fedora kernel: CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM1) > [ 0.019900] fedora kernel: Last level iTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 0, 4MB 0 > Last level dTLB entries: 4KB 512, 2MB 32, 4MB 32 > tlb_flushall_shift: 5 > [ 0.020118] fedora kernel: Freeing SMP alternatives: 24k freed > --- > A beginning of support for multiline messages. Is this the right approach? > > (Not all formats are updated). I guess, more or less. Though i'd probably change utf8_is_printable() to always say that \n is an OK char to print. Doing the destinction between is_printable_n() vs is_printable_oneline() sounds unnecessarily complex? Hmm, maybe a simpler approach regarding the expansion of \n would be to extend strip_tab_ansi() to take an additional string param for what to expand \n to? I think that would be a much simpler patch, no? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
