Lennart Poettering [2013-06-17 18:28 +0200]: > On Mon, 17.06.13 06:41, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > > > > No, by placing it in /usr (or /lib, for old distributions which haven't > > > done the /usr merge yet) you break the rule that the files the systemd > > > package installs in /usr should be the same on all installations of the > > > same package version. > > > > It doesn't at the moment, as the file is in the package it is the same > > on all installations (of the same architecture). > > I cannot parse this. > > Let me try to explain this a different way: in RPM-speak the files in > /etc should ideally either be %ghost'ed or %config'ed, and the ones in > /usr should be neither.
That's the situation with a dynamically created file as you have in current Fedora. But the current Ubuntu package just ships a static /lib/udev/hwdb.bin, thus it is perfectly shareable between installations and thus Tom's concern about not being a package-owned file doesn't apply. That's of course unrelated to the question whether we should move to dynamic creation of that file, at which point it wouldn't be suited very well in /lib (but still much better than in /etc). Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
