On Fri, 28.06.13 10:06, Holger Hans Peter Freyther (hol...@freyther.de) wrote:
> Well, that is one part. "make test" really just checks if the test/ > directory exists, it doesn't really contribute to the quality control. > > The other thing with "make check" is that it is failing if the build > system doesn't run systemd[1] or fails if the installed version is not > new enough (debian still ships systemd 44 that doesn't have catalogs > so the catalog test fails). Happy to see this fixed. THis is not the usual setup we build things on. We are all Fedora-based. > > >> The problems always seem to come from non-standard/broken setups > > > > > > Could you please elaborate on standard vs. non-standard/broken setups. > > > travis is building on a clean VM and installing most of the packages > > > specified in the README file. > > systemd currently does not link on default Debian/Ubuntu systems. > Could you please elaborate how this is a non-standard/broken setup? Well, the systemd core developers are all on Fedora, and Ubuntu doesn't even use systemd, so it's a bit of an exotic choice. I mean, I am not saying that it is an excuse for elaving this broken, I am just trying to point out why we didn't notice this. > I can make it link by installing binutils-gold, if systemd now > requires gold, could you please update the configure.ac and README > to reflect this? We use the normal Fedora linker, which I think is normal ld, not gold. We should certainly be able to make this work for any linker. Patch appreciated, as we do not run these systems ourselves. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
